<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Program Evaluation on Jeremy Meng</title><link>https://jeremyxtmeng.github.io/tags/program-evaluation/</link><description>Recent content in Program Evaluation on Jeremy Meng</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2022 22:55:34 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://jeremyxtmeng.github.io/tags/program-evaluation/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Fiscal Spending and Growth: New Evidence from a Natural Experiment</title><link>https://jeremyxtmeng.github.io/portfolio/fiscalgrowth/</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2022 22:55:34 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://jeremyxtmeng.github.io/portfolio/fiscalgrowth/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In this paper, I study the long-term economic effects of temporary government spending shocks by using the surge in U.S. government procurement during World War I as a natural experiment. The project asks whether short-lived fiscal spending can create persistent improvements in regional economic activity, or whether its effects disappear once the spending shock ends.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Digitized over 10,000 historical procurement contracts to construct original state-level measures of government spending exposure during World War I.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Used cross-state variation in wartime procurement spending as a natural experiment to estimate the causal effect of temporary fiscal shocks on regional growth.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Built a state-level historical panel linking government spending shocks to subsequent changes in personal income, employment, and regional economic outcomes.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Estimated the dynamic effects of government spending over time, showing that temporary spending shocks led to sustained increases in personal income and employment.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Found that the effects persisted even seven years after the initial spending shock, suggesting that temporary fiscal interventions can generate longer-lasting regional growth.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Contributed new evidence to the debate on fiscal multipliers, regional development, and whether government spending can have persistent effects beyond the short-run demand response.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>